Making a Difference: NFL Fan of the Year Tom Grossi uses platform to give back
Four recognized as 2023 Aurora Health Care Nurses of the Year
June 28, 2023
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently filed a complaint against Amazon.com, accusing the company of engaging in deceptive practices related to its Prime program.
In the complaint, the FTC alleges Amazon employed manipulative tactics, known as “dark patterns,” to enroll consumers in Prime without their consent, while also complicating the cancellation process.
This legal action brings into focus the implications of such practices on businesses and the importance of consumer protection measures in the digital marketplace.
Understanding dark patterns, deceptive enrollment
At the heart of the FTC’s complaint lies the concept of dark patterns – which are described as user interface designs that exploit psychological principles to mislead or coerce users into taking unintended actions.
In the case of Amazon, dark patterns were allegedly used during the online checkout process, where users were presented with numerous opportunities to sign up for Amazon Prime, often overshadowing the option to make purchases without a subscription.
The language and design of these options failed to clearly convey that choosing certain paths would result in an ongoing subscription, leading many consumers to unknowingly become Prime members and incur charges without their explicit consent.
Unraveling the complexities of cancellation
The complaint also highlights Amazon’s alleged deliberate efforts to complicate the process of canceling Prime subscriptions.
Many users who wished to unsubscribe faced a convoluted and frustrating journey.
Instead of providing a simple cancellation flow, Amazon reportedly redirected users through multiple pages offering discounted rates, the option to disable auto-renewal or discouraging them from canceling altogether.
Amazon even internally dubbed the cancellation procedure “Iliad Flow,” a nod to Homer’s epic poem of more than 15,000 lines.
This labyrinthine process discouraged users from completing the cancellation and resulted in continued subscription charges against their wishes.
Protecting consumers
The FTC plays a vital role in safeguarding consumers’ interests and ensuring fair practices in the marketplace.
As the primary regulatory body for consumer protection in the United States, the FTC is responsible for enforcing existing laws and regulations.
One such regulation is the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA) – which the FTC alleges Amazon has violated – that aims to protect consumers from deceptive online practices.
Under ROSCA, the FTC mandates clear disclosure of material terms/conditions and obtaining informed consent from consumers before charging them for products or services.
The FTC actively monitors and investigates potential violations, taking legal action when necessary to hold businesses accountable for non-compliance.
The current legal action against Amazon seems to be part of a broader trend of the FTC cracking down on deceptive practices in the digital marketplace.
In fact, in a record-breaking settlement in December, the FTC secured agreements requiring EPIC Games, Inc. (creator of the popular video game Fortnite) to pay a total of $520 million in relief, with $245 million of that settlement stemming from similar allegations of dark pattern and billing practice violations.
Strengthening consumer protection measures
The FTC’s complaint against Amazon has broader implications for businesses operating in the digital marketplace.
By pursuing legal action against Amazon, the FTC is putting businesses on notice that there are serious ramifications for violating principles of informed consent, transparency and fairness when engaging with consumers online.
It also underscores the need for stronger consumer protection measures.
As consumers increasingly rely on online platforms for their shopping needs, policymakers and industry stakeholders must work collaboratively to strengthen regulations, update existing statutes and ensure robust enforcement.
This collaborative effort is crucial to foster a fair and transparent digital marketplace that prioritizes the rights and interests of consumers.
As the case unfolds, it will likely prompt a reevaluation of existing regulations and potentially pave the way for more stringent online commerce guidelines.
A call to action
The FTC’s complaint against Amazon serves as a wake-up call, signaling a renewed focus on consumer protection in the digital age.
As the case unfolds in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, it has the potential to reshape the landscape of digital commerce and establish new precedents for protecting consumers from deceptive tactics.
The outcome of this case will have significant ramifications for Amazon and the broader business community.
It will influence how companies design their user interfaces, communicate terms and conditions and ensure consumers have a clear understanding of the services they are subscribing to.
Businesses across all industries should take this opportunity to evaluate their own enrollment and cancellation processes, ensuring compliance with fair practices.
By prioritizing clear communication, informed consent and user-friendly experiences, businesses can foster trust, avoid legal repercussions and contribute to a more transparent and consumer-centric digital marketplace.
Curtis A. Edwards is an associate attorney at Lin Law LLC. His practice focuses on business law, real estate, probate, trust administration and estate planning.
